NASF
State & Private
Smokey Bear
NFP Success Stories
Employment
Forestry Links

Publications

State Forestry

 

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE FORESTERS
444 North Capitol Street, NW, Suite 540, Washington, DC 20001
 

April 30, 2004

The Honorable Conrad Burns, Chairman
Subcommittee on Interior and Related Agencies
Attention:  Outside Witness Testimony
United States Senate, SD-132
Washington, DC 20510

TESTIMONY ON FY 2005 APPROPRIATIONS: Forest Service and Dept. of the Interior
Burnell C. Fischer, President of the National Association of State Foresters
Before U.S. Senate Appropriations Interior Subcommittee

INTRODUCTION

The National Association of State Foresters (NASF) is pleased to provide testimony on the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) $4.98 billion budget request for Fiscal Year 2005.  Representing the directors of state forestry agencies from all fifty states, eight U.S. territories, and the District of Columbia, our testimony centers around those program areas most relevant to the long term forestry operations of our constituents.  State and Private Forestry programs multiply the public benefits of Federal funding by leveraging in-kind contributions through cost-share programs and matching funds from states.  Wildland Fire Management supports essential State and Private and Federal programs to address wildland fire.  We commend the President’s commitment to the Healthy Forests Restoration Act and the Healthy Forests Initiative in the USFS budget for FY 2005.  Our recommendations include our top three priorities (FLEP, Forest Health, and State Fire Assistance) and discuss other opportunities for Congress to further the advancement of sustainable management on both public and private forestland nationwide.

sTATE AND PRIVATE FORESTRY programs

Forest Land Enhancement Program (FLEP)

NASF urges Congress to fund FLEP at $20 million for FY 2005.  The 2002 Farm Bill provided $100 million for FLEP over five years.  Replacing the Forestry Incentives Program (FIP) and the Stewardship Incentives Program (SIP) by combining the best attributes of these predecessor programs, FLEP is able to better meet the needs of family forest landowners.  FLEP implementation began in FY 2003 with $20 million.  The result was an enormously successful and popular forestry cost-share, technical assistance, and educational program.  However, $50 million was transferred from FLEP to help pay for Forest Service fire suppression efforts during the 2003 fire season, with $10 million repaid by Congress.  Congress’ help is now needed to ensure that the $10 million for FLEP in FY 2004 is made available to the Forest Service and funds are appropriated for FY 2005.  

Family forest owners have demonstrated funding needs for three to five times the amount that could be funded in the first year.  The President’s FY 2005 budget proposes the remaining $40 million in the FLEP account, including the $10 million appropriated for FY 2004, would be “canceled”.  No other program provides direct assistance to help landowners implement forest management practices on family forest lands.  Financial assistance typically results in a two-to-four-fold increase in the implementation of sustainable forestry practices on private lands, allowing landowners to better meet long-term public demand for timber, clean water, and other forest resources while providing environmental benefits for the general public.  NASF recommends funding FLEP at $20 million in FY 2005 by rejecting the language in the Administration’s budget and instead reinstating the $40 million remaining in the account

Forest Health Management (FHM)

The Forest Health Management (FHM) programs within State and Private Forestry are the only federal programs that address the breadth of forest health threats across all of our nation’s forests.  Every year, invasive species cost the American public $138 billion in losses, detection, and control.  Providing for the prevention, detection, and suppression of damaging insects, diseases, and plants, this program also assists in the development and application of new technologies to address forest health problems on all lands.  FHM is funded under both State and Private Forestry (S&PF) and Wildland Fire Management.

NASF recommends funding S&PF Forest Health Management for Federal and Cooperative Lands at FY 2004 levels ($54 million for Federal lands and $45 million for Cooperative lands) to provide the tools needed to address Forest Health issues across the many forest types and ownerships in the United States. 

NASF also recommends $15 million for Federal lands and $10 million for Cooperative lands to continue level support for Forest Health Management under Wildland Fire Management to address forest health problems that increase the risk of catastrophic wildland fire.  Forest health management helps states achieve the goals of the Healthy Forests Initiative. 

State Fire Assistance (SFA)

State Fire Assistance (SFA) provides much-needed financial and technical assistance to states for wildland fire management.  It ensures that state resources receive the best training and can acquire and maintain equipment necessary to prepare them to act as the first line of defense for their local forests and communities.  These fire fighting resources serve both as “first responders” for local situations and as “ready reserves” for large federally managed catastrophic fires.  Further, it is the only program that currently provides some funding for fuel reduction work on non-federal lands. SFA is funded under both Cooperative Fire Protection (State and Private Forestry) and Wildland Fire Management in the Forest Service budget.  Together with Volunteer Fire Assistance, these programs provide critical support for the wildland firefighting community.

SFA provides the flexibility to meet different state needs, which may include firefighting preparedness, firefighter training, fire suppression, and hazardous fuel reduction, as well as prevention activities.  In addition, the renewed focus on hazardous fuel reduction will wear out equipment more quickly, requiring more frequent repair and replacement.  A reduction in SFA will be counterproductive, making it more difficult for states – often the first line of defense – to extinguish small fires quickly before they grow into large, costly fires.  

NASF recommends continued level funding for State Fire Assistance at $28 million under Cooperative Fire Protection and $51 million under Wildland Fire Management, as well as funding for Volunteer Fire Assistance at $5.0 million under Cooperative Fire Protection and $8.1 million under Wildland Fire Management.  Funding these line items at last year’s level provides continued protection for local communities from catastrophic wildland fire, many of which originate on federal lands.

NASF also recommends funding Community and Private Land Fire Assistance (CPLFA).  The model for this program began with National Fire Plan funding in FY 2001.  Subsequently authorized in the 2002 Farm Bill at $35 million per year, NASF recommends $20 million to begin implementation of the program in FY 2005.  CPLFA is the perfect tool to help communities leverage limited wildfire mitigation dollars and achieve the goals laid out in the Healthy Forests Restoration Act:  to prepare community wildfire protection plans, restore unhealthy forests on private lands, and to reduce fuels around communities. 

Forest Stewardship Program

The Forest Stewardship Program continues to serve as the foundation program for promoting sustainable forest management on family forest lands.  The program compliments the Forest Land Enhancement Program (FLEP) by providing landowners assistance in creating sustainable forestry Stewardship Plans that can be implemented with cost-share funds from FLEP.  From 1991 to 2002, the Forest Stewardship program turned out more than 217,000 Stewardship Plans covering more than 25 million acres.  NASF supports the President’s proposed funding of $41 million in FY 2005 for the Forest Stewardship Program.

Watershed Forestry Assistance Program (WFAP)

NASF recommends funding the Watershed Forestry Assistance Program (WFAP) with the full $15 million authorized in Title III of the Healthy Forests Restoration Act for FY 2005.   Through forestry practices in targeted watersheds and collaborative approaches to watershed restoration, WFAP provides landowners, communities, and organizations with the technical and financial tools necessary to protect and restore water resources.  By focusing on priority watersheds within each state, this unique program is able to leverage funding and support from local watershed partnerships to measurably increase water quality and overall watershed health. 

Urban and Community Forestry

NASF recommends funding the Urban and Community Forestry program at $36 million in FY 2005.  The program leverages existing local efforts by assisting rural and urban communities to manage, maintain, and improve their tree cover and green spaces, achieving important social and economic benefits.

Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA)

The Forest Inventory and Analysis program provides crucial forest information to policy makers and land managers, enabling them to make informed forestry-related decisions.  Increasing funding for this program will enable the important work to continue, while improving the quality of information being provided.   NASF recommends $64 million for FIA to continue progress toward implementation of the FIA strategic plan.  Together with a well funded research program, FIA will continue to provide essential inventory data for addressing long-term forest management needs.

Economic Action Program (EAP)

The Economic Action Program is the only federal assistance program that targets forest-based economic development.  With our current forest health threats across the country, EAP helps find local solutions to forest health problems while fostering economic sustainability in communities.  State Foresters will continue to work with the Forest Service and rural communities to help communities deliver a focused and results oriented forest-based economic development program.  NASF supports level funding for the Economic Action Program at $11 million, not including Congressional earmarks.

OTHER FEDERAL PROGRAMS

Federal Wildland fire management

NASF recommends continued funding of federal wildland fire management at the 10-year average.  Funding is integral to quickly suppress small fires before they grow into large and costly fires.  The increasing costs of wildfires – due mainly to drought, fuel accumulation, and the rapid expansion of the wildland-urban interface – makes adequate suppression funding critical.  We support continued funding for preparedness, fire operations, and hazardous fuels treatment on federal land, including the $15 million provided under State and Private Forestry Appropriations that may be used on non-Federal land to protect communities at risk from adjacent USFS lands where hazard reduction activities are planned.

DOI conservation grant programs

NASF supports the Department of the Interior conservation grant programs for private landowners to manage their land for a variety of public benefits.  Continued funding will ensure these programs remain viable.

CONCLUSION

NASF seeks the Subcommittee’s support for a Forest Service FY 2005 budget that will ensure the continued delivery of a broad range of public benefits from privately owned forest lands.  Collaboration among stakeholders across the landscape—federal, state, and local government agencies, private landowners, industry, and non-profit organizations—is necessary to manage for the wide range of forest resources and values found on all ownerships.  Cooperative Forestry, State and Private Forestry (S&PF), and Wildland Fire Management provide these links, and the federal share leverages private dollars and provides an important catalyst for collaboration in order to take the work far beyond the usual boundaries of federal land management.  Thank you for the opportunity to provide our testimony.

 

Sincerely,

/s/ Burnell C. Fischer

Burnell C. Fischer
President